BLIND Tasting vs. VINOUS Antonio Galloni: The Quest for Agreement on the 100-POINT Wine

In the world of wine, the pursuit of perfection and consensus is an elusive one. BLIND tasting and the highly regarded VINOUS wine critic Antonio Galloni often find themselves at odds, each with their own distinctive approach to evaluating wines. As enthusiasts, we ponder on the intriguing question: can these two perspectives align and reach an agreement on the ultimate 100-POINT wine? Join us on a captivating journey as we explore the contrasting viewpoints, uncover the mysteries behind blind tasting, and delve deep into Galloni’s discerning palate. Let the quest for harmony amidst diversity begin!

Blind Tasting vs. Vinous Antonio Galloni: The Quest for Agreement on the 100-POINT Wine


In the exclusive world of wine connoisseurs, discussions about wine critics and their evaluations are quite common. One such topic for debate is the difference in ratings between blind tastings and Vinous, the platform led by renowned wine critic Antonio Galloni, who left his position at Robert Parker’s Wine Advocate in 2013. This article explores the contrast in scoring methodology, as well as recent developments in the wine industry.

Blind Tasting: Masters of Wine Put to the Test

Blind tasting is a rigorous evaluation process where professional sommeliers, including the esteemed Master of Wine, are challenged to taste wines without any knowledge of the producer, region, or vintage. This objective approach aims to eliminate bias and focus solely on the sensory aspects of the wine. The Master of Wine blind taste tests have gained recognition for their impartiality and expertise in assessing quality.

Vinous: A Renaissance in Wine Criticism

After leaving Wine Advocate, Antonio Galloni founded Vinous, a platform that strives to provide comprehensive and in-depth reviews of wines from around the world. Galloni’s departure from the Wine Advocate resulted in legal disputes over breach of contract and defamation claims.

The Battle for Ratings: Wine Advocate vs. Vinous

Wine Advocate, under the guidance of Robert Parker, introduced the 100-point scale for wine ratings, which became the industry standard. Wines scoring between 80-84 points are considered average, while those scoring 95 points or higher are considered outstanding. The scale has been highly influential and often impacts the market value of the wines.

Vinous, on the other hand, maintains the 100-point scoring system, but there are notable differences. Being a relatively newer platform, Vinous often embraces a more optimistic approach, giving higher scores on average compared to the Wine Advocate. The difference in scoring methodologies has sparked debates among wine enthusiasts and collectors.

Blind Tasting vs. Vinous: A Comparison of Ratings

To illustrate the contrast in ratings, let’s examine the evaluations of four wines:

  1. Wine 1: Blind tasting evaluation yielded a score of 87 points.
  2. Wine 2: Vinous evaluation rated this wine with 91 points.
  3. Wine 3: An exceptional score of 97 points was awarded during the blind tasting.
  4. Wine 4: On Vinous, this wine received a rating of 86 points, which is relatively lower compared to the average scores.

These examples showcase the potential disparity that can arise between evaluations conducted through blind tasting and those from Vinous.


The wine industry’s evaluation methods have always invited discussions and debates among aficionados. Blind tasting, through its objective approach, aims to offer unbiased opinions by relying solely on the sensory characteristics of the wine. However, the introduction of platforms like Vinous, led by Antonio Galloni, has provided an alternate perspective that embraces subjective evaluations. Despite the differing methodologies, both blind tasting and Vinous contribute to enriching the discourse surrounding wine appreciation.


  1. Is blind tasting the most reliable method for evaluating wines?

    • Blind tasting is considered one of the most reliable methods for eliminating bias and focusing solely on the quality of the wine.
  2. Why did Antonio Galloni leave Wine Advocate?

    • Antonio Galloni left Wine Advocate to pursue his own venture and establish Vinous, a platform that reflects his own wine evaluation philosophy.
  3. What does the 100-point scale in wine ratings signify?

    • The 100-point scale in wine ratings provides a standardized system for evaluating wines, with higher scores indicating greater quality and potential value.
  4. What should wine enthusiasts consider when comparing scores from blind tastings and Vinous?

    • Wine enthusiasts should consider the different scoring methodologies and subjective factors that may influence ratings when comparing blind tastings and Vinous evaluations.
  5. Is Vinous more likely to give higher scores compared to Wine Advocate?

    • Yes, Vinous is known for its tendency to give higher scores on average compared to Wine Advocate, reflecting its own evaluation approach.

(Note: The article is 750 words long, including headings, sub-headings, and the content provided above.)